HOME   FUNDRAISING

Orange w Blossom  H & S CITRUS, INC

In The News...

 

A word of caution Partners, if you are buying ORANGE JUICE at your local grocery store....

FDA tests threaten Brazil orange juice imports

Health regulators are testing all incoming shipments of oranges for traces of an illegal fungicide called carbendazim.

By Anna YukhananovTue, Jan 10 2012 at 4:18 PM EST

oranges in crate
ORANGES: A U.S. juice producer had detected low levels of carbendazim in orange juice concentrate imported from Brazil. The pesticide is banned in U.S. citrus but it is used on orange trees in Brazil to fight mold. (Photo: Getty Images)
WASHINGTON, D.C. - Fears that the U.S. might ban imports of orange juice from Brazil drove orange juice futures to an all-time high on Tuesday as health regulators began testing all incoming shipments for traces of an illegal fungicide called carbendazim.
 
According to the Food and Drug Administration, a U.S. juice producer had detected low levels of carbendazim in orange juice concentrate imported from Brazil, the top grower accounting for more than 10 percent of the U.S. supply.
 
The pesticide is banned in U.S. citrus but it is used on orange trees in Brazil to fight mold. The FDA said low levels of carbendazim were not dangerous and the agency had no plans for a recall, but it would stop any shipments of orange juice at the border that tested positive for the fungicide.
 
Orange juice futures jumped almost 11 percent to an all-time high on the news, which was announced by the FDA in a letter to the Juice Products Association on Monday.
 
The orange juice market is particularly prone to volatility because of its tiny size compared to oil and other major commodities.
 
It was not immediately clear whether there would be a related increase in orange juice prices for consumers, as that would depend on how long futures stay high and whether this results in a shortage of orange juice shipments into the United States.
 
Brands such as Tropicana, from PepsiCo Inc., and Minute Maid, from Coca-Cola Co, may use a mix of juices sourced from Brazil and the United States.
Read More:  http://www.mnn.com/food/healthy-eating/stories/fda-tests-threaten-brazil-orange-juice-imports

 

 

Attention: Fundraising Partners...even though we call to let you know when your truck is loaded and leaving the packinghouse, we also supply you with the driver's name and cell phone number.  With the new ruling below (from FMCSA), your driver may not be in a position to answer the cell phone, if you should call.

U.S. Transportation Secretary LaHood Announces Final Rule That Bans Hand-Held Cell Phone Use by Drivers of Buses and Large Trucks

Today’s Action is the Latest by the Department to End Distracted Driving

WASHINGTON - U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood today announced a final rule specifically prohibiting interstate truck and bus drivers from using hand-held cell phones while operating their vehicles. The joint rule from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) and the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) is the latest action by the U.S. Department of Transportation to end distracted driving.

"When drivers of large trucks, buses and hazardous materials take their eyes off the road for even a few seconds, the outcome can be deadly," said Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. "I hope that this rule will save lives by helping commercial drivers stay laser-focused on safety at all times while behind the wheel."


The final rule prohibits commercial drivers from using a hand-held mobile telephone while operating a commercial truck or bus. Drivers who violate the restriction will face federal civil penalties of up to $2,750 for each offense and disqualification from operating a commercial motor vehicle for multiple offenses. Additionally, states will suspend a driver's commercial driver's license (CDL) after two or more serious traffic violations. Commercial truck and bus companies that allow their drivers to use hand-held cell phones while driving will face a maximum penalty of $11,000. Approximately four million commercial drivers would be affected by this final rule.

"This final rule represents a giant leap for safety," said FMCSA Administrator Anne S. Ferro. "It's just too dangerous for drivers to use a hand-held cell phone while operating a commercial vehicle. Drivers must keep their eyes on the road, hands on the wheel and head in the game when operating on our roads. Lives are at stake."

While driver distraction studies have produced mixed results, FMCSA research shows that using a hand-held cell phone while driving requires a commercial driver to take several risky steps beyond what is required for using a hands-free mobile phone, including searching and reaching for the phone. Commercial drivers reaching for an object, such as a cell phone, are three times more likely to be involved in a crash or other safety-critical event. Dialing a hand-held cell phone makes it six times more likely that commercial drivers will be involved in a crash or other safety-critical event.

In September 2010, FMCSA issued a regulation banning text messaging while operating a commercial truck or bus and PHMSA followed with a companion regulation in February 2011, banning texting by intrastate hazardous materials drivers.

"Needless injuries and deaths happen when people are distracted behind the wheel," said PHMSA Administrator Cynthia Quarterman. "Our final rule would improve safety and reduce risks of hazmat in transportation."


Nearly 5474 people died and half a million were injured in crashes involving a distracted driver in 2009. Distraction-related fatalities represented 16 percent of overall traffic fatalities in 2009, according to National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) research.


Many of the largest truck and bus companies, such as UPS, Covenant Transport, Wal-Mart, Peter Pan and Greyhound already have company policies in place banning their drivers from using hand-held phones.


The final hand-held cell phone ban rule can be accessed here.

(http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/rules-regulations/administration/rulemakings/final/Mobile_phone_NFRM.pdf)


To learn more about the U.S. Department of Transportation's efforts to stop distracted driving, please visit http://www.distraction.gov

 
Citrus land continues to disappear on the Treasure Coast...
http://www.tcpalm.com/news/2011/oct/02/citrus-land-continues-to-disappear-on-the-coast/
 

If commercial citrus acreage in Martin County continues to decline at the current rate, there will be none left in another three years.

Because of diseases, hurricanes and urban expansion, citrus acreage has declined all across Florida in recent years, down 27 percent from the 853,742 acres producing citrus in 1994.

Statewide, orange acreage is at its lowest since 1986.

Nowhere in Florida, however, has acreage fallen off as sharply as in Martin County, which has only 21 percent remaining of the 48,221 acres that were in production in 1994, the U.S. Department of Agriculture's annual survey shows.

Losing 4,567 acres last year alone, Martin County has incurred the greatest loss of acreage among Florida counties for three straight years and has been on a steady decline since 1994.

In same three-year period, St. Lucie County acreage is down 18 percent and Indian River County acreage is down about 11 percent.

Among the casualties was a 1,717-acre citrus grove in Palm City owned by the King Ranch and its subsidiary Consolidated Citrus, the largest citrus grower in Florida.

Because of greening, citrus is no longer viable on the property, the company has said. After a court battle with conservationists, King Ranch's AgTEC (Agricultural and Targeted Employment Center) plan received final approval this summer from the state's planning agency for a mix of industrial, commercial and agricultural development.

Combined, citrus acreage on the Treasure Coast has decreased by almost 24 percent since 2008, while the rest of the state has lost only 2 percent.

Growers in the Indian River District, a narrow strip of Florida's eastern seaboard, stretching 200 miles from the Daytona Beach area to West Palm Beach and including the Treasure Coast, produce three-fourths of the state's grapefruit. Most of that grapefruit is sold fresh to overseas markets.

The USDA report said grapefruit acreage statewide fell to a new low of 48,990 acres, representing only 55 percent of the pre-hurricanes figure.

Tom Jerkins, vice president and general manager of Blue Goose Growers LLC in Fort Pierce, said he thinks the companies that own most of the 10,000 citrus acres in Martin County are like him.

"We tend to fight," Jerkins said. "We're not willing to stop, even when it may be prudent to stop."

About 2,000 of the 16,000 acres of citrus groves Blue Goose manages are in Martin County.

Pete McClure, agricultural research and business development manager for Vero Beach-based Evans Properties Inc., said Martin County acreage has declined faster than elsewhere in Florida, including St. Lucie and Indian River counties, because Martin County groves were hit harder by diseases such as canker and greening that moved up from South Florida.

"It's possible that Indian River and St. Lucie could be like Martin County unless we develop better management strategies," McClure said.

Evans Properties also has about 16,000 acres in production, but only one 1,500-acre orange grove in western Martin County.

And the spate of hurricanes in 2004, and Tropical Storm Fay since then, hit Martin County harder, McClure said.

"There was a lot of damage to older, mature trees that wasn't immediately noticeable, but it made them more susceptible to diseases," he said.

The diseases haven't gone away, but growers are gaining renewed optimism and cautiously replanting some groves, said Paul Genke, sales manager for Packers of Indian River in Fort Pierce, which has a total of about 2,700 acres of groves in St. Lucie and Indian River counties, but none in Martin County.

"The disease problem is still prevalent, but owners want to be in the business for the long term," Genke said.

Citrus acreage

..............................................% decline............% decline

..................................2011......from 1994.........from 2008

Indian River ...............34,899....... -49.6.................-10.5

Martin........................10,046....... -79.2.................-56.6

St. Lucie.....................39,223.......-63.8................-18.4

Treasure Coast............84,168...... -62.7................ -23.7

Rest of Florida...........457,160......-27.2................. -2.0

Source: U.S. Department of Agriculture's National Agricultural Statistics Service - Florida Field Office